← All issues

AEO/GEO RADAR · 15 September 2026

Most AI citations never say the brand's name, and Cloudflare's AI crawler default takes effect today.

Confirmed at source

Cloudflare's AI crawler default is live from today

Cloudflare's own wording: for all new domains onboarding, "Training and Agent will be blocked by default on the pages that display ads, while Search will remain allowed by default." Its blog and developer changelog were read this morning: nothing on AI crawlers since 3 September. Some guides circulating today say it also flips all existing free accounts. Cloudflare's post does not say that. The sharper exposure is unchanged: "multi-purpose crawlers such as Googlebot, Applebot, and BingBot will be blocked by customers who have selected to block Training."

Cloudflare blog, 1 July 2026 (the announcement; nothing new published since)
Measured, with numbers

62% of AI citations never name the brand they link to

Method: 115 prompts localised across 14 countries, 3,981 domain appearances, on ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and AI Mode, measured with Semrush's own tool. Semrush calls a page used as a source whose brand never appears in the answer a "ghost citation": 61.7% of appearances. Only 13.2% had both a citation and a mention; 25.1% were mentions with no citation. Engines split sharply: ChatGPT cited at 87% but mentioned at 20.7%; Gemini mentioned at 83.7% but cited at 21.4%. The page also says short conversational prompts had brand mention rates "of nearly 100%" against "2%-3%" for long structured prompts.

Limits: small prompt set, no date range, no runs per prompt, vendor tool. The short-versus-long figure has no breakdown, and the prompts only ran 16 to 98 characters. The 25 coaching questions, measured this morning, run 38 to 92 characters (mean 62.2), inside that same range, so whatever drove that gap was not length alone.

Semrush, Margarita Loktionova, 9 June 2026 (older, new to this desk), read first-hand
Reported, not confirmed

Two experiments: other people's pages drove the mentions, and half stopped within a month

Test one: an existing brand, 15 commercial keywords on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity over several months. Listicles accounted for 72.4% of citations and PR for 24.1%. Test two: a SaaS brand with no measurable AI presence, 15 keywords on six engines, 30 May to 28 June after a baseline month. It logged 298 appearances in 30 days; three sources supplied 342 of 437 source mentions (about 78%). "Roughly half of the sources stopped being cited within 30 days." The author's conclusion: an owned listicle "is more of a foundation than a primary growth engine."

Limits: tier 5. One agency marketing its own service, 15 keywords each, manual checks with no stated frequency, software niches, and the article does not define whether an "appearance" was a name or a link.

Search Engine Land, Zeeshan Yaseen (CEO, RankViz, an agency selling link building and AI visibility), 14 September 2026

The Radar is free to read and always will be. If you want to know whether AI names your business when a buyer asks, the free check asks ChatGPT 25 real buyer questions and emails you the answer within the hour.

Get the Radar by email →